|
The first Sommets du tourisme of 1999
were devoted to the ecological aspects of
sustainable development in the area of tourism. It
was shown for example that locations that are
attractive for the purpose of tourism are often
ecologically fragile. Tourism and the environment
are thus closely intertwined. The management of
difficult and complex ecological problems in
relation to tourism travel and on-site tourism is
thus one of the permanent challenges facing tourism
development.
In the conflict of interest between society's
need for development and for conservation, priority
must be given to saving the last natural beauty
spots from the tourist hordes and bringing the
"hypermobility" of modern tourism under control.
Questions that arise in this context are whether or
not it is feasible for the rest of the world to
imitate the travel habits of the industrialised
nations -- would the ecology of our "blue planet"
be able to survive such a development ? Or would it
further accelerate the irreversible process of
entropy ? Of course as we all know there are
inescapable socio-political reasons that make
freedom to travel an inalienable right.
Efforts are nonetheless being made to gradually
reduce our consumption of essential resources as
much as possible, while steadily reducing all forms
of environmental pollution, above all in the
interest of future generations, who should have the
benefit of a wide range of development options.
Putting this into practice will however require the
full collaboration of all concerned parties at the
local level in decisions relevant to
development.
The second Sommets du tourisme in 2000
took as its theme the clash of two fundamental
objectives: tourism growth vs environmental
protection. It was made very clear that both too
much growth and too little growth are contradictory
to the aims of sustainable development.
Stabilising or reducing growth in heavily
trafficked areas, although very desirable for
purely ecological reasons, is hardly compatible
with a market economy system. In conditions of
competition on price at a global level it is not
possible, when visitor numbers flatten or even
begin to fall, to ensure the revenues companies
need over the long term. At the same time
insufficient tourism development would neither have
an economic impact beneficial for the local
population nor would it help with existing
environmental problems, either in a local or a
global context.
The second summit recognised the
consolidation of growth as one of the main
problems of sustainable development in tourism.
Another conclusion reached was that due to the
volatility of demand in tourism there can be
no such thing as guaranteed growth in this area.
Only those who are able to offer attractive
products on a cost-effective basis and to market
them effectively can expect to succeed in the hotly
contested world tourism market. Those unable to
cash in on their products will be unable to attract
investment capital or to pay attractive wages. They
will either fall short of their employment and
income objectives, or miss them entirely.
|